First post - yeah boy.
In response to an email from a very cool, languid character known as the Biz (which it must be said is awesome and may warrant capturing in a blog):
basically i don’t fuck with communicating with you people about hiphop related matters cuz there is only one person on this email who declared that one day he was gonna own this city and it sure as hell isn’t any of you. some of y’all get all touchy about hiphop shit, some of you had careers in hiphop, and some of you even accused others of purposefully holding out on others (of you) in relation to the doctrine of hiphop to retard personal development, and while that’s all very clever and presumably interesting, being as hiphop as i am i actually don’t give a fuck.
having said that, if the own the city guy did one day go on to own the city he would probably dance a little bit like drake does in his new clip ‘started from the bottom’. which incidentally, is the way the own the city guy felt when he talked about doing that.
i want you to observe the steps, and know something.
bitches.
ps. if your name is james on this email you an extra bitch.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RubBzkZzpUA
my mate the Kid said this:
The track is something. The clip is something else. But the email
is something else again. It could be one of the most fascinating missives I have
ever received. Now that I am a failed banker, failed entrepreneur, failed
henchman and failed publisher, I got time, I'm going to turn my hand to failed
faux-academic and write a PhD on this. Incredibly incendiary, angry and
needlessly provocative, frothing with the angst of perceiving yourself as
misunderstood, the unnamed known characters, this is derogatory and dismissive
by establishing a created and homogenous plural 'other' - honestly 'you people'
can't be merely spoken it must be spat - yet inclusive in a
your-last-chance-learn-someink-right-here way and offering the hope of
redemption but the knowledge is ultimately elusive as demonstrated through the
seemingly truncated sentence 'I want you to observe the steps and know
something'. It is short a final clause that would otherwise convey that which we
are supposed to know. What is it that we are supposed to know? Everything? The
steps? Does its ambiguity an exasperation, implying the audience know nothing at
all, so know something (anything!). A declaration so passionate this email
channels the aggrieved boy who was burning with a rage at not owning this
city. TIA? No, TIHH - This Is Hip Hop. In that way as a performance I would cast
you as Daniel Day Lewis, the great modern day method actor, deep in the role,
still, though the voice is largely characterised by the grammar of ebonics - the
method - there are passages more reminiscent of your normal metre as if there is
a battle going on. What does it mean? Is it style not substance and therefore
all this content analysis is entirely the wrong framework? The psychology of
this has left me enrapture, nose-diving down my own filthy rabbit hole of
over-analysis and paranoia and whole fractals full of
Death-Of-The-Author interpretations that slide wonderfully about as if tossed
like a scared sailor on the heaving deck of a ship caught in a Southern Ocean
storm. Where am I?
5 out of 5 cornrows
5 out of 5 cornrows
Awesome. Just awesome.
No comments:
Post a Comment